Historiography is an art for historians to create a work of writing about history. Historiography like a canvas, which will be painted by historians with a painting of historic events, past events are unique, and so forth. Historiography imaging a nation, over the course of history and what has contributed to human civilization in the past.
But has it ever occurred to us, that the history of this nation, Indonesia, is one of the nation that has failed in creating their own history? Is it true that this nation is a nation whose history is built on the history of other nations, which are said to have long colonized Indonesia so that their history is also our history? Does such a trip of Indonesia this? Bambang Purwanto book discusses in detail how Indonesian Historiography how could say "failed".
Who is he? Bambang is a professor of the Department of History, University of Gadjah Mada that has since 1994 become the manager of the study of history in the UGM. Influence love of history, he departs from a professor of history who once owned by the nation, namely Sartono Kartodirjo. Books by the Sartono he enjoy doing. He was great in an environment that cultivates the history and undergo education CONTAINS history anyway. At least it was two reasons why he is so steeped in the history of science.
And in his work entitled The Failure of Historiography Indonesiasentris?! This, Bambang again raised his views on Sartono Kartodirjo, by stating his views on the book by Sartono entitled Approach methodology of History in History. Pak Bambang judge the book at least is the impetus for him to re-refer a case which is still debated, namely Historiography Indonesiasentris. He is to say, that the Sartono book, the book described as "blue" Her Indonesian historians.
Talking about historiography, according to Bambang, can not be separated from the concept and methodological issues in view of the past. This is an important point that he always adopted in several niches discussion contained in the book The Failure of Historiography Indonesiasentris?! The. Moreover, Bambang admitted that lately has sprung a new discourse in the writing of history, and the transfer of ideas so busy discussed the development of science in the repertoire of the history of Indonesia.
Simple issue that is not really new is muncullnya debate about the validity of historical sources. Many historians, according to Bambang, still see that document or source of history are written documents and oral histories. Outside it was still doubtful keabdsahannya. So when one of the references used comes from western researchers, it is proper reference is treated as an attitude toward history in general reference sources, which should be examined first source of legitimacy through a process and its relevance. This is what is expected by Bambang so that future, he wrote the book into Indonesian historiography debate in the future, because the book itself is generally talking about it.
Book
Failure book Historiography Indonesiasentris?! Bambang Purwanto paper describes a difference in viewpoints that are often experienced by historians associated authorship of Indonesian history. In the early part of his work, Bambang told a effort where there is a narrow construction when talking about historiography in Indonesiasentris. It becomes a debate in this nation bagiaman can have many strands of history that so build the character of this nation. One of the things that became the stumbling block is the influence sentirs-centric others who turned out to be merged in any historian, namely Kolonialsentris or can also be called Neerlandosentris.
Centric-centric turned out to confine the concept of related historians think what things should be written in the writing of the history of this nation. Can not be denied again if the colonial Dutch who colonized Indonesia so long was building abstract thinking mindset of the nation. So Historiography Indonesiasentris, according to Bambang, tends to be seen as something that's it contents. Eliminate a string of Indonesian human civilization, their lives, and other elements of life with a name that is Indonesianisasi, Nationalization, or even indigenization.
Bambang also add other material discussed in the book, such as the Indonesian military and legitimacy historiographical, historiography tragedy, and so forth. But most of the attention Bambang focus to the Indonesian historiography with all aspects related to it, a general definition, the problems arising in the historiography of Indonesia, a new discourse in historiography that will be associated with the writing of the history of Indonesia, and do not forget the impact of the VOC, the Dutch colonialism against traveling authorship of history in Indonesia.
That is why in the preface to the first chapter, Bambang discuss in depth about awareness regarding construction indonesiasentris historiography, for what, character and type, to use in writing the history of the nation. The hope he is aware of historians to understand what exactly is said to be failing in the Indonesian historiography.
Book material in general portrait of the phenomenon of historiography in Indonesia were contaminated by some problems. Variations such problems become common chapters discussed in this book. General view of the problems that occurred in the history of authorship in the historiography of Indonesia to matter splash reader curiosity over what is actually happening in the authorship of this nation's history.
But has it ever occurred to us, that the history of this nation, Indonesia, is one of the nation that has failed in creating their own history? Is it true that this nation is a nation whose history is built on the history of other nations, which are said to have long colonized Indonesia so that their history is also our history? Does such a trip of Indonesia this? Bambang Purwanto book discusses in detail how Indonesian Historiography how could say "failed".
Who is he? Bambang is a professor of the Department of History, University of Gadjah Mada that has since 1994 become the manager of the study of history in the UGM. Influence love of history, he departs from a professor of history who once owned by the nation, namely Sartono Kartodirjo. Books by the Sartono he enjoy doing. He was great in an environment that cultivates the history and undergo education CONTAINS history anyway. At least it was two reasons why he is so steeped in the history of science.
And in his work entitled The Failure of Historiography Indonesiasentris?! This, Bambang again raised his views on Sartono Kartodirjo, by stating his views on the book by Sartono entitled Approach methodology of History in History. Pak Bambang judge the book at least is the impetus for him to re-refer a case which is still debated, namely Historiography Indonesiasentris. He is to say, that the Sartono book, the book described as "blue" Her Indonesian historians.
Talking about historiography, according to Bambang, can not be separated from the concept and methodological issues in view of the past. This is an important point that he always adopted in several niches discussion contained in the book The Failure of Historiography Indonesiasentris?! The. Moreover, Bambang admitted that lately has sprung a new discourse in the writing of history, and the transfer of ideas so busy discussed the development of science in the repertoire of the history of Indonesia.
Simple issue that is not really new is muncullnya debate about the validity of historical sources. Many historians, according to Bambang, still see that document or source of history are written documents and oral histories. Outside it was still doubtful keabdsahannya. So when one of the references used comes from western researchers, it is proper reference is treated as an attitude toward history in general reference sources, which should be examined first source of legitimacy through a process and its relevance. This is what is expected by Bambang so that future, he wrote the book into Indonesian historiography debate in the future, because the book itself is generally talking about it.
Book
Failure book Historiography Indonesiasentris?! Bambang Purwanto paper describes a difference in viewpoints that are often experienced by historians associated authorship of Indonesian history. In the early part of his work, Bambang told a effort where there is a narrow construction when talking about historiography in Indonesiasentris. It becomes a debate in this nation bagiaman can have many strands of history that so build the character of this nation. One of the things that became the stumbling block is the influence sentirs-centric others who turned out to be merged in any historian, namely Kolonialsentris or can also be called Neerlandosentris.
Centric-centric turned out to confine the concept of related historians think what things should be written in the writing of the history of this nation. Can not be denied again if the colonial Dutch who colonized Indonesia so long was building abstract thinking mindset of the nation. So Historiography Indonesiasentris, according to Bambang, tends to be seen as something that's it contents. Eliminate a string of Indonesian human civilization, their lives, and other elements of life with a name that is Indonesianisasi, Nationalization, or even indigenization.
Bambang also add other material discussed in the book, such as the Indonesian military and legitimacy historiographical, historiography tragedy, and so forth. But most of the attention Bambang focus to the Indonesian historiography with all aspects related to it, a general definition, the problems arising in the historiography of Indonesia, a new discourse in historiography that will be associated with the writing of the history of Indonesia, and do not forget the impact of the VOC, the Dutch colonialism against traveling authorship of history in Indonesia.
That is why in the preface to the first chapter, Bambang discuss in depth about awareness regarding construction indonesiasentris historiography, for what, character and type, to use in writing the history of the nation. The hope he is aware of historians to understand what exactly is said to be failing in the Indonesian historiography.
Book material in general portrait of the phenomenon of historiography in Indonesia were contaminated by some problems. Variations such problems become common chapters discussed in this book. General view of the problems that occurred in the history of authorship in the historiography of Indonesia to matter splash reader curiosity over what is actually happening in the authorship of this nation's history.
Comments
Post a Comment